2016
DOI: 10.1166/jmihi.2016.1603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance Vector Machine Based Pulmonary Nodule Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LIDC database contains a total of 1018 patient cases, each of which stores the lung CT images of each patient (image size is 512×512), and an XML comment file containing lung nodule information. The annotation information was diagnosed by four radiologists with extensive experience in CT cases and provides diagnostic information and evaluation information of the medical signs of the lung nodule [51, 52]. The specific experimental processing is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LIDC database contains a total of 1018 patient cases, each of which stores the lung CT images of each patient (image size is 512×512), and an XML comment file containing lung nodule information. The annotation information was diagnosed by four radiologists with extensive experience in CT cases and provides diagnostic information and evaluation information of the medical signs of the lung nodule [51, 52]. The specific experimental processing is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a series of medical image processing steps presented in our previous work [29], 204 candidate nodules of size > 3mm were extracted, consisting of 64 nodules and 140 non-nodules marked by at least one radiologist.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUC achieved by their approach is better than ours, but the accuracy is lower than ours. The works in both (Wu et al 2016, Li et al 2018 used texture, shape and intensity features to characterize nodules. An AUC of 0.95 was achieved in Li et al (2018) but not described in Wu et al (2016).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed With Other Methods Based On Tradi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SVM classifier achieved the best accuracy of 91.81%. Wu et al (2016) extracted gray, five geometric features and grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based texture features from nodules and used relevance vector machine (RVM) to improve the classification task. They achieved an accuracy of 79.4%.…”
Section: Traditional Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%