2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-009-9521-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability analysis for the uncertainties in vehicle and high-speed railway bridge system based on an improved response surface method for nonlinear limit states

Abstract: The paper deals with the reliability analysis for the high-speed railway bridge systems. Although the bridge-vehicle interactive system has much more uncertainties in the resistance and loads of trains moving at very high speed compared with static structural analysis, little concern has been engaged to identify which random variable has to be considered in the probabilistic analysis, or what criteria should be selected to determine the probabilistic safety or serviceability. The considered design parameters t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present analysis each run of the Monte-Carlo simulation employs one sample of track irregularities generated from the power spectrum of the German low-interference track. In the existing research, Cho et al (2010) selected the bridge damping ratio, concrete elasticity modulus, and cross-sectional area as the random parameters for the calculation of bridge dynamic deflection. Rocha et al (2012) performed a variable sensitivity analysis without considering track irregularity to find out which one has impact on the bridge dynamic responses.…”
Section: Input and Output Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present analysis each run of the Monte-Carlo simulation employs one sample of track irregularities generated from the power spectrum of the German low-interference track. In the existing research, Cho et al (2010) selected the bridge damping ratio, concrete elasticity modulus, and cross-sectional area as the random parameters for the calculation of bridge dynamic deflection. Rocha et al (2012) performed a variable sensitivity analysis without considering track irregularity to find out which one has impact on the bridge dynamic responses.…”
Section: Input and Output Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reconstruct incompletely observed or missing data, imputation models are commonly selected, which include the regression method for monotone data, the non-parametric Propensity method [18], and the MCMC [16] for non-monotone cases. In this research, creating a predictive distribution has been applied based on predictive distributions, while the data are averaged over all possible parameter values for the maintenance data of a bridge structure.…”
Section: Hierarchical Bayesian Inference Model To Predict Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For analyzing these correlations and the resulting deterioration, conventional stochastic modeling of structural components and systems has been applied mainly on the basis of Event Tree Analysis (ETA) [15], Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) [16], and regression simulation in terms of the Response Surface Method (RSM) or adaptive RSM [17,18]. ETA is a method for illustrating the sequence of outcomes that may arise after the occurrence of a selected initial failure event and for ranking accidents, considering that the order of events needs permutation-based calculations, which produce a large number of cases for predicting failure scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the principle of virtual work, utilizing a linearized wheel-rail contact equation to avoid iterative solution at each time step of the integration, and applying rail irregularity as random excitations to the system, the probabilistic evaluation approach for nonlinear vehicle-bridge dynamic performances has been analysed by Jin et al [22]. By developing an improved response surface method for nonlinear limit states, Cho et al [23] evaluated the reliability of vehicle and highspeed railway bridge system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%