2006
DOI: 10.1108/02656710610672489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability analysis of a cooling seawater pumping station

Abstract: PurposeThis paper aims to examine the reliability of a cooling seawater pumping station which pumps seawater to refineries and petrochemical plants in Kuwait mainly for cooling purposes. Owing to the harsh operating climate and the lack of other alternative sources of water, high reliability of the pumping system is crucially important.Design/methodology/approachThe reliability of a system can be considered from different views. The one taken in this study is to measure the reliability of the cooling seawater … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for pipe of a lesser wall thickness, the Thomas Method (Thomas 1981) is used in a manner mentioned by Moosemiller (2006). In early risk work in the 1980's and 1990's, the Thomas method gave good results for estimating the failure rate of piping (e.g., Johnson 1988;Medhekar, Bley, and Gekler 1993) and it has been used more recently as well (Vinod et al 2004;AlSalamah, Shayan, and Savsar 2006). In the late 1990's when more data from piping operating experiences were compiled and analyzed, the risk assessment community has decided that the Thomas method should be secondary to experience data (Lydell 2000).…”
Section: Pipe Wall Thickness Scaling Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for pipe of a lesser wall thickness, the Thomas Method (Thomas 1981) is used in a manner mentioned by Moosemiller (2006). In early risk work in the 1980's and 1990's, the Thomas method gave good results for estimating the failure rate of piping (e.g., Johnson 1988;Medhekar, Bley, and Gekler 1993) and it has been used more recently as well (Vinod et al 2004;AlSalamah, Shayan, and Savsar 2006). In the late 1990's when more data from piping operating experiences were compiled and analyzed, the risk assessment community has decided that the Thomas method should be secondary to experience data (Lydell 2000).…”
Section: Pipe Wall Thickness Scaling Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on practical applications of availability analysis in process industry plants at operation phase is found not very abundant. Nevertheless, several attempts to conduct the analysis on various plants have been made by several researchers [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Despite these efforts, the adoption of this technique as a decision making tool among industry practitioners is still not widespread.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maintenance horizon of six months (M = 4320 hours) is used to manage the actuators degradation and a supply service level of γ = 95% is required. These nominal degradation values are based on typical failure rates as those used in [5], and on the analysis developed in [81] about the relation between failure coefficients and degradation coefficients. The forecast demand involved in the proposed safety stocks allocation policy is based on a forecasting module proposed later on Chapter 6, which predicts future water demands for the selected case study according to past demands and weather conditions (i.e., temperature and relative humidity).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%