2018
DOI: 10.4314/njt.v37i3.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability analysis of CFRP shear walls subject to blast loading

Abstract: This study presents the structural reliability of CFRP shear walls subject to blast loading. The safety of a reinforced concrete shear wall, laminated with Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer, is modelled with a 108.9kg of Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil (ANFO) an explosive, with an equivalent magnitude of 87kg Trinitrotoluene (TNT). The shear performance of the laminated wall under the blast is evaluated using the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) in MATLAB environment. An increasing decline in the shear possibilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of analysis is very accurate for modelling at short intervals to record the high-frequency characteristics of shock and blast wave load and determine the structure response. The explicit method allows us to evaluate the nonlinear effects of materials and the geometry of the problem (Ajimituhuo et al, 2018). The explicit method is beneficial and practical for modelling dynamic problems in time and frequency, such as impact analysis and seismic effects.…”
Section: Dynamic Explicit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This type of analysis is very accurate for modelling at short intervals to record the high-frequency characteristics of shock and blast wave load and determine the structure response. The explicit method allows us to evaluate the nonlinear effects of materials and the geometry of the problem (Ajimituhuo et al, 2018). The explicit method is beneficial and practical for modelling dynamic problems in time and frequency, such as impact analysis and seismic effects.…”
Section: Dynamic Explicit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this equation, t f  is the tensile strength of concrete or in other words, the cracking stress of concrete, which according to ACI-318, is considered equal to 0.62 c f  . Furthermore, the 28-day compressive strength of the standard cylindrical sample, denoted by c f  , is considered equal to 40 MPa (Ajimituhuo et al, 2018). Moreover, the eccentricity is denoted by  the angle between the Von-Mises deflection stress and the hydrostatic stress, which is called the expansion angle and is denoted by  , varies between 15 and 45 degrees (Epackachi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Boundary Conditions Meshing and Component Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%