2018
DOI: 10.1002/qre.2396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability analysis of structures based on a probability‐uncertainty hybrid model

Abstract: The traditional reliability analysis method based on probabilistic method requires probability distributions of all the uncertain parameters. However, in practical applications, the distributions of some parameters may not be precisely known due to the lack of sufficient sample data. The probabilistic theory cannot directly measure the reliability of structures with epistemic uncertainty, ie, subjective randomness and fuzziness. Hence, a hybrid reliability analysis (HRA) problem will be caused when the aleator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, some other design variables may lack sufficient data, which can be estimated by domain experts and regarded as uncertain variables. The structure cannot be simply considered to be a random or uncertain structure model under mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainties [37]. This section put forward an advanced structural reliability assessment method for this issue depending on chance measure and belief reliability theory.…”
Section: Structural Reliability Assessment Methods Under Mixed Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, some other design variables may lack sufficient data, which can be estimated by domain experts and regarded as uncertain variables. The structure cannot be simply considered to be a random or uncertain structure model under mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainties [37]. This section put forward an advanced structural reliability assessment method for this issue depending on chance measure and belief reliability theory.…”
Section: Structural Reliability Assessment Methods Under Mixed Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decades, numerous reliability assessment methods based on probability theory have been developed, including first-order reliability method (FORM) [23], second-order fourth moment [29] Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) [24], FORM-sampling simulation method [22], envelope function method [28], response surface method (RSM) [6], and Bayesian networks method [26]. Although these probabilistic methods typically make sense in uncertainty quantification and propagation when the structure is mainly affected by aleatory uncertainty, they do not work well in the scenarios involving great epistemic uncertainty [37]. For example, the distribution of input factors may not be precisely obtained due to insufficient sample data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the abovementioned definitions of the soft failure and the hard failure, system failure is the competing result between them. According to the studies about the uncertainty theory–based belief reliability metrics, 22,23,43 at a given time t , the reliability function of the soft failure based on the chance measure can be expressed as RSFt=Chmax0stYs<H=Chmax0stXs+Ss<H.…”
Section: Uncertain Process–based Reliability Model Under Competing Failure Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbasi et al [7] presented the modeling and verification process for the reliability analysis of electrical system components. Zhang et al [8] discussed the hybrid reliability analysis problems when the aleatory and epistemic uncertainties coexist in a structure. Hu and Peng [9] introduced a dynamic model with random and dependent transition probabilities for non-repairable discrete-time multi-state systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%