2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability analysis with Metamodel Line Sampling

Abstract: This paper presents an approach for reliability analysis of engineering structures, referred to as Metamodel Line Sampling (MLS). The approach utilizes a metamodel of the performance function, within the framework of the Line Sampling method, to reduce computational demands associated with the reliability analysis of engineering structures. Given a metamodel of the performance function, the failure probability is estimated as a product of a metamodel-based failure probability and a correction coefficient. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested in [48], the RBDO and RO algorithms implementing sampling-based reliability methods can be organized into three groups; applications of metamodels, decoupling approaches, and enhanced reliability approaches. A metamodel is commonly a regression or a classification model constructed as an approximation of the performance function (e.g., [15]). A metamodel is applied within RO or RBDO algorithms to reduce the computa-tional demands resulting from computationally complex models of engineering structures.…”
Section: Short Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested in [48], the RBDO and RO algorithms implementing sampling-based reliability methods can be organized into three groups; applications of metamodels, decoupling approaches, and enhanced reliability approaches. A metamodel is commonly a regression or a classification model constructed as an approximation of the performance function (e.g., [15]). A metamodel is applied within RO or RBDO algorithms to reduce the computa-tional demands resulting from computationally complex models of engineering structures.…”
Section: Short Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial amount of the literature for both structural reliability analyses and RBDO of offshore wind turbines (OWTs) has focused on aspects other than support structure design. Areas such as blade design (Ronold et al, 1999;Toft and Sørensen, 2011;Dimitrov, 2013;Hu et al, 2016;Caboni et al, 2018), foundation design (Yoon et al, 2014;Carswell et al, 2015;Depina et al, 2016Depina et al, , 2017Haj et al, 2019;Velarde et al, 2019), component design (Kostandyan and Sørensen, 2011;Rafsanjani et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2014;Li et al, 2017), system/wind farm aspects (Sørensen et al, 2008), inspection and maintenance planning, and probabilistic tuning/optimization of safety factors (Sørensen and Tarp-Johansen, 2005;Márquez-Domínguez and Sørensen, 2012;Veldkamp, 2008) have all been studied. As for support structure design specifically, though most structural analyses of OWTs remain deterministic, there has been a number of stud-ies incorporating reliability-based (or otherwise probabilistic) approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods to derive cost effective, optimal support structure designs -balancing minimal use of materials (and potentially other cost driving design A substantial amount of the literature for both structural reliability analyses and RBDO of offshore wind turbines (OWTs) has focused on aspects other than support structure design. Areas such as, e.g., blade design (Ronold et al, 1999;Toft and Sørensen, 20 2011;Dimitrov, 2013;Hu et al, 2016;Caboni et al, 2018), foundation design (Yoon et al, 2014;Carswell et al, 2015;Depina et al, 2016;Haja et al, 2019;Depina et al, 2017;Velarde et al, 2019), component design (Kostandyan and Sørensen, 2011;Rafsanjani et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2014;Li et al, 2017), system/wind farm aspects (Sørensen et al, 2008), inspection and maintenance planning and probabilistic tuning/optimization of safety factors (Sørensen and Tarp-Johansen, 2005; Márquez-Domínguez and Veldkamp, 2008) have all been studied. As for support structure design specifically, though 25 most structural analyses of OWTs remain deterministic, there has been a number of studies incorporating reliability-based (or otherwise probabilistic) approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%