2019
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and agreement between the test and retest of the 10-repetition maximum (10-RM) test for leg press and bench press in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Thirty-one BCS participated in this study, age 54.87 ± 5.7 years. All performed 10-RM tests and retests for the leg press 45° and the bench press. For reliability analyses, an intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were performed. The limits of agreement were calculated using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the volunteers were able to perform more than ten repetitions, the load was increased by 5-10%. An interval of three minutes was given in-between the sets [24,25].…”
Section: Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the volunteers were able to perform more than ten repetitions, the load was increased by 5-10%. An interval of three minutes was given in-between the sets [24,25].…”
Section: Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of repetitions in RM tests has been shown to have little difference in the reliability between a 1RM power clean (CV = 4.8%) and a 5RM leg press (CV = 2.2–4.7%) ( Gail & Künzell, 2014 ; Lawton, Cronin & McGuigan, 2014 ). Additionally, other work has shown reliability to be relatively stable across the number of repetitions in an RM test ( Gail & Künzell, 2014 ; Lattari et al, 2020 ; McCurdy et al, 2004 ; Santos et al, 2019 ). The current results suggest that unless a 1RM value is specifically required, a 5RM test may be a viable option as although the test is still maximal, the absolute load will be lower and this may be important in certain populations ( e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Then, the load will be progressively increased while the number of repetitions will decrease accordingly until only ten repetitions can be completed. A recovery period of 2 min will be provided between each set 39 40…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%