Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Test of Motor Impairment-Henderson Revision

Riggen, Katherine J.; Ulrich, Dale A.; Ozmun, John C.

doi:10.1123/apaq.7.3.249

Cited by 26 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the M‐ABC has been compared against the full BOTMP before (Riggen et al . 1990; Henderson & Sugden 1992), this is the first study to compare a lay‐administered short form version of the BOTMP to a clinician‐administered M‐ABC.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing probable case identification of developmental coordination disorder using the short form of the Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and the Movement ABC

Cairney

Hay

Veldhuizen

et al. 2009

Child

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim Despite its widespread current use in research and its potential for future application, the validity of the short form of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP-SF) when administered by trained lay assessors is not known. This paper reports the results of case identification using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) in a group of children scoring below the sixth percentile on the BOTMP-SF. Methods The BOTMP-SF was administered by trained research assistants to 2058 children. In total, 24 of 128 children aged 10 (n = 10), 11 (n = 10) or 12 (n = 4) scoring below the sixth percentile were randomly selected for further assessment by a paediatric occupational therapist using the M-ABC and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Results Twenty-one of 24 children positive for motor co-ordination problems on the BOTMP-SF scored below the 15th percentile of the M-ABC, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.69 to 0.96]. Fifteen of these children were below the fifth percentile (PPV = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.43 to 0.79). Conclusions The BOTMP-SF seems to be a reasonable alternative to case identification when clinical assessment with the M-ABC is not feasible. Further research is needed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the short form when used for this purpose.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing probable case identification of developmental coordination disorder using the short form of the Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and the Movement ABC

Cairney

Hay

Veldhuizen

et al. 2009

Child

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the selection of stricter cut-off scores in previous studies has also led to poor accuracy in identifying these children. 9,10,14 A limitation of the current study was that the sample did not include any child who had been previously identified as having motor problems; therefore, no comparison of test results with functional performance could be attained.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The SF was found to be a valid test of motor proficiency in Greek preschool and primary school children without disabilities. 8 Regarding the discriminative accuracy of the SF, findings of previous studies 9,10 have shown that there is a remarkable inconsistency between classification of motor impairment (MI) on the BOTMP-SF compared with other tests such as the McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development 11 and the Test of Motor Impairment -Henderson revision. 12 Both of the aforementioned tests were found to be more accurate discriminators of MI than the SF.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency for identifying children with motor impairment

Venetsanou

Kambas

Aggeloussis

et al. 2007

Develop Med Child Neuro

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study compared the consistency of the Short Form (SF) and the Long Form (LF) of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP) in identifying preschool children with motor impairment (MI). One hundred and forty-four Greek preschool children participated (74 males, 70 females; mean age 5y 2mo [SD 5mo], range 4y 6mo-5y 6mo). Although total SF and LF scores were highly correlated (r=0.85), paired t-tests indicated significant differences (t=-27.466, p=0.001). SF total scores (mean 58.72 [SD 7.28]) were higher than LF total scores (mean 47.38 [SD 9.43]). SF had low sensitivity (13.6%) and negative predictive value (72.5%) for identifying MI. The BOTMP-SF does not appear to be a valid test for the identification of MI in 5-year-old children.

show abstract

“…One of the gold-standards for motor development is the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (Hattie & Edwards, 1987; Riggen, Ulrich, & Ozmun, 1990; Tan, 2001). This is a standardized and norm-referenced test of motor development that is widely used by clinicians (especially occupational and physical therapists) and researchers to evaluate motor performance and to discriminate children with motor disorders from those who are developing normally.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Generalized Motor Abilities and Timing Behavior in Children With Specific Language Impairment

Zelaznik

Goffman

2010

J Speech Lang Hear Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To examine whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) differ from normally developing peers in motor skills, especially those related to timing. Method Standard measures of gross and fine motor development were obtained. Furthermore, finger and hand movements were recorded while children engaged in four different timing tasks, including tapping and drawing circles in time with a metronome or a visual target. Fourteen children with SLI (aged 6- to 8-years) and 14 age-matched peers who were typically developing participated. Results As expected, children with SLI showed poorer performance on a standardized test of gross and fine motor skill than their normally developing peers. However, timing skill in the manual domain was equivalent to typically developing children. Conclusions Consistent with earlier findings, relatively poor gross and fine motor performance is observed in children with SLI. Surprisingly, rhythmic timing is spared.

show abstract

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Test of Motor Impairment-Henderson Revision

Cited by 26 publications

References 12 publications

Comparing probable case identification of developmental coordination disorder using the short form of the Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and the Movement ABC

Comparing probable case identification of developmental coordination disorder using the short form of the Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and the Movement ABC

Use of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency for identifying children with motor impairment

Generalized Motor Abilities and Timing Behavior in Children With Specific Language Impairment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About