2001
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2001.93.1.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children

Abstract: Reliability and concurrent validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children were evaluated with a sample of 106 boys and girls, distributed into four age groups: 5-6 yr. (n = 20), 7-8 yr. (n = 20), 9-10 yr. (n = 46), and 11-12 yr. (n = 20). Test-retest reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, estimated using intraclass correlation coefficients, was high across all age groups, and concurrent validity yielded moderate Pearson correlation coefficients between the Move ment battery and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
67
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
67
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The MABC evaluates three domains: manual dexterity; ball-handling skills; and static-dynamic balance. The three domains were assessed in all the patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The MABC evaluates three domains: manual dexterity; ball-handling skills; and static-dynamic balance. The three domains were assessed in all the patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum value of the test-retest reliability at any age for the TOMI is 0.75 and of the inter-rater reliability 0.70 (Henderson & Sugden, 1992). For the M-ABC, test-retest reliability is high over a 1-week period (0.92 to 0.98), with good concurrent validity with the BruininksOseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (Bruininks, 1978) (moderate Pearson correlation coefficients (r .60 to .90) (Croce, Horvat, & McCarthy, 2001) and high inter-rater reliability (0.95 to 1.00) (Smits-Engelsman, Fiers, Henderson, & Henderson, 2008). The M-ABC is an internationally recognized instrument for identifying children with motor difficulties (Barnett & Henderson, 1998, Croce et al, 2001.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine motor skills (e.g. drawing and writing skills, manipulating objects such as scissors) make noticeable gains through the early school years (Croce et al, 2001;Frankenburg et al, 1992;Majnemer and Snider, 2005;Plubrukarn and Theeramanoparp, 2003;Yule et al, 1967). As children get older, hand dexterity continues to improve in a more subtle way (increased rhythmicity, speed, and coordination of movements) reaching a plateau during mid-to late-adolescence depending on the complexity of the motor skill (more complex motor skills reaching maturity later) (Denckla, 1973;Denckla, 1974;Largo et al, 2001a;Largo et al, 2001b;Wolff et al, 1998).…”
Section: Clinical Measures Of Neuromotor Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%