2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and convergent validity of the 6-min run test in young adults with Down syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CRF was assessed using the 6-minute time trial (6MTT) [ 34 , 35 ]. Participants were instructed to cover the greatest distance possible in 6 minutes while walking, running or a combination, between 2 cones on a flat indoor 20m course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRF was assessed using the 6-minute time trial (6MTT) [ 34 , 35 ]. Participants were instructed to cover the greatest distance possible in 6 minutes while walking, running or a combination, between 2 cones on a flat indoor 20m course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, the test–retest has been analysed in one or various isolated tests—the majority obtained from a specific physical capacity. For example, the 6MWT [17,33,34] and the HG [35,36] are two tests that the reliability of which has been evaluated previously in adults with DS; however, they have not been supplemented with feasibility data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests were selected based on their psychometric properties, their low cost and having been previously used both in subjects with DS [10,16,17], ID [18,19] and in other populations [20,21]. Eight field-based fitness tests were proposed to assess the PF of adults with DS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests were selected based on their psychometric properties, their low cost, and having been previously used both in participants with DS (Ayán‐Pérez et al, 2017), ID (Perez‐Cruzado et al, 2017). In addition, another study used this methodology (Cabeza‐Ruiz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%