Reliability and risk evaluation of a port oil pipeline transportation system in variable operation conditions

Soszyńska, J.

doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.01.002

Cited by 36 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The risk to the long gas and oil pipeline project in China caused by landslides during its construction is assessed [7]. Reliability and risk of a port oil pipeline transportation system in variable operation conditions are evaluated [8]. Urban natural gas pipeline networks are assessed from the qualitative aspects and the quantitative aspect [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Risk of Natural Gas Pipeline Operation Management in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguistic Environments

Liu

et al. 2018

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Natural gas pipeline has been regarded as the most cost effective and safest channel of gas transportation and has extraordinary strategic significance for the country. There is a need to control the risks during the operation so as to operate the pipeline safely and smoothly under the complicated business environment. In order to evaluate the risk of natural gas pipeline operation management, this paper proposed an approach to evaluate the risk of natural gas pipeline operation management in intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic environments. Firstly, the evaluation criteria of the risk of natural gas pipeline operation management are established from the strategic risk, market risk, financial risk, operation risk, and legal risk aspects. Then experts are invited to evaluate the risk level and the weight of criteria using the linguistic terms. Rating values with regard to the criteria are in linguistic forms; the linguistic terms are modeled with the intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic model. The linguistic ratings are aggregated as the final results. Finally, the example is given to illustrate the feasibility and practicability of the proposed method.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Risk of Natural Gas Pipeline Operation Management in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguistic Environments

Liu

et al. 2018

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Wu and Alireda et al [2,3] carried out risk evaluations of offshore crude oil pipeline based on Bayesian Network model. Joanna evaluated the reliability and risks associated with the port oil pipeline transportation system [4]. Zhang and Zhao et al [5 -7] proposed early-warning models for river pollution contingencies based on 1D, 2D dynamics water quality model, and EFDC model, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial Analysis of Leakage Accidents of Oil Pipeline River Crossing Sections

Wang¹,

Li²,

Xi³

2016

TOCIEJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Oil pipeline leakages often bring catastrophic impacts on rivers along the pipeline, drinking water sources, and farm land irrigation etc. Based on the distinct spatial-temporal attributes in the analysis of oil spill, diffusion and consequences thereof, we present the theoretical concept and reasoning for leakage accidents spatial analysis through combining GIS and accident aftermath model. Specifically, we aim to achieve quantitative analysis and visualization of oil spill accidents through several GIS functions, which include buffer analysis, overlay analysis, spatial statistical analysis and visualized analysis. Taking a specific leakage accident of oil pipeline river-crossing section as an example, we have analyzed the polluted areas under different diffusion time and the hydrological conditions. In addition, we have evaluated populations and farm land areas affected in terms of drinking water and irrigation as well as their spatial distributions. The results demonstrate that our method can achieve quantitative analysis and visualized representations of oil spills to support policy-makers in making contingency plans.

show abstract

“…Reliability reflects the characteristics more than the classification accuracy of land cover data, and thus it has numerous impacts in applying the data and affects strategic decision and planning. Reliability evaluation is widely applied in various fields, such as power system, network, software, and pipeline [14][15][16][17]. In the field of geographical information science and remote sensing, Zhang et al [18] proposed a fusion approach of several typical change-detection algorithms based on the reliability of individual change-detection algorithms to generate reliable land cover change information.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of Land Cover Products Using Reliability Evaluation Methods

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Validation of land cover products is a fundamental task prior to data applications. Current validation schemes and methods are, however, suited only for assessing classification accuracy and disregard the reliability of land cover products. The reliability evaluation of land cover products should be undertaken to provide reliable land cover information. In addition, the lack of high-quality reference data often constrains validation and affects the reliability results of land cover products. This study proposes a validation schema to evaluate the reliability of land cover products, including two methods, namely, result reliability evaluation and process reliability evaluation. Result reliability evaluation computes the reliability of land cover products using seven reliability indicators. Process reliability evaluation analyzes the reliability propagation in the data production process to obtain the reliability of land cover products. Fuzzy fault tree analysis is introduced and improved in the reliability analysis of a data production process. Research results show that the proposed reliability evaluation scheme is reasonable and can be applied to validate land cover products. Through the analysis of the seven indicators of result reliability evaluation, more information on land cover can be obtained for strategic decision-making and planning, compared with traditional accuracy assessment methods. Process reliability OPEN ACCESSRemote Sens. 2015, 7 7847 evaluation without the need for reference data can facilitate the validation and reflect the change trends of reliabilities to some extent.

show abstract

Reliability and risk evaluation of a port oil pipeline transportation system in variable operation conditions

Cited by 36 publications

References 4 publications

Evaluating the Risk of Natural Gas Pipeline Operation Management in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguistic Environments

Evaluating the Risk of Natural Gas Pipeline Operation Management in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguistic Environments

Spatial Analysis of Leakage Accidents of Oil Pipeline River Crossing Sections

Validation of Land Cover Products Using Reliability Evaluation Methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About