2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of 4D rasterstereography under dynamic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies have shown the high accuracy and reliability of this system [11,12]. Hackenberg et al [13] compared radiographs with rasterstereographic measurements and found a good correlation of r = 0.89 for the frontal deviation in subjects even with scoliosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have shown the high accuracy and reliability of this system [11,12]. Hackenberg et al [13] compared radiographs with rasterstereographic measurements and found a good correlation of r = 0.89 for the frontal deviation in subjects even with scoliosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of studies, rasterstereography has proven to have high reliability and accuracy when compared to x-rays [13], [19], [20], [21]. However, it would be of great value to be able to also three-dimensionally evaluate the spine under dynamic conditions to provide a better understanding, of the rigidity of scoliosis or phenomena like the influence of pelvic obliquity and leg length inequality on the spine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the orientation of the skin surface over the lumbar dimples, it is also possible to draw conclusions on pelvic torsion around the transverse axis (17). The high accuracy and reliability of this technique was shown in multiple studies (22,26). In comparison to radiographic measurements, Hackenberg et al (20) showed a good correlation coefficient of 0.89 for frontal deviation of the spine in subjects with scoliosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this study, we measured the immediate effects of different foot positions and height on pelvis position and spinal posture with a rasterstereographic device. We have decided to use rasterstereography because it is contact free, accurate, and highly reliable (26,34). A further advantage of rasterstereography is that it allows statements about both pelvic position and spinal posture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%