2014
DOI: 10.1186/preaccept-7886628611978914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of a simple and clinically applicable pain stimulus: sustained mechanical pressure with a spring-clamp

Abstract: Background: Generalized hyperalgesia, a widespread increased sensitivity to painful stimuli, has been demonstrated in a range of chronic pain conditions including low-back pain. The evidence suggests, that generalized hyperalgesia may be an important factor in the development of chronicity, but it is not commonly assessed in clinical practice. Whereas a range of tools and procedures for the quantitative sensory testing of pain sensitivity is available for laboratory pain research, most experimental pain stimul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, authors were contacted for further information. Of these 29, seven authors did not respond (Biurrun Manresa et al., 2011; Margolis et al., 1986, 1988; Myburgh et al., 2011; O'Neill et al., 2014; Reigo et al., 1998; Vuilleumier et al., 2015), and for one article, the authors were not contactable (Cummings & Routan, 1987). Therefore, we were unable to confirm the population for these articles and subsequently excluded them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, authors were contacted for further information. Of these 29, seven authors did not respond (Biurrun Manresa et al., 2011; Margolis et al., 1986, 1988; Myburgh et al., 2011; O'Neill et al., 2014; Reigo et al., 1998; Vuilleumier et al., 2015), and for one article, the authors were not contactable (Cummings & Routan, 1987). Therefore, we were unable to confirm the population for these articles and subsequently excluded them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%