2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the HADS for screening depression and anxiety in psycho-cardiological outpatients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
71
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chinese version of HADS has excellent internal consistency and construct validity. Individuals whose HADS-D score was above 9 indicated depression symptoms, with higher scores representing higher depression (Yang et al, 2014). In this study, the internal consistency coefficient of HADS-D was α = 0.81.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The Chinese version of HADS has excellent internal consistency and construct validity. Individuals whose HADS-D score was above 9 indicated depression symptoms, with higher scores representing higher depression (Yang et al, 2014). In this study, the internal consistency coefficient of HADS-D was α = 0.81.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Higher scores indicates more symptoms of depression or anxiety. Scores of ≥9 on the depression subscale and ≥6 on the anxiety subscale were used to denote the presence of clinically significantly depressive and anxiety symptoms in Chinese patients with physical illness, respectively [52]. The Chinese version of the HADS is reliable and valid in physically ill patients [52].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current psychometric data validate the quality of this scale on the national as well as on the international level (Cronbach's alpha >0.80). 33, 34, 35, 36 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%