2015
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.12836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of a single‐item physical activity measure for adolescents

Abstract: These findings suggest the single-item measure can provide a reliable and valid assessment of youth physical activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
15

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
69
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be due to the study's advertisement on a university website, and a higher interest of women in topics concerning diet (Baker & Wardle, 2003). Single-item measures avoid misleading assessments, lead to higher response rates and less missing data in longitudinal studies, and can be as reliable and valid as multiple-item measures (e.g., Gogol et al, 2014;Scott, Morgan, Plotnikoff, & Lubans, 2015). Also, as only participants who had completed all three assessments were included in the present study, this may have resulted in a sample that is biased towards higher motivation to change FVI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be due to the study's advertisement on a university website, and a higher interest of women in topics concerning diet (Baker & Wardle, 2003). Single-item measures avoid misleading assessments, lead to higher response rates and less missing data in longitudinal studies, and can be as reliable and valid as multiple-item measures (e.g., Gogol et al, 2014;Scott, Morgan, Plotnikoff, & Lubans, 2015). Also, as only participants who had completed all three assessments were included in the present study, this may have resulted in a sample that is biased towards higher motivation to change FVI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we used a single item to assess autonomy beliefs. Single-item measures avoid misleading assessments, lead to higher response rates and less missing data in longitudinal studies, and can be as reliable and valid as multiple-item measures (e.g., Gogol et al, 2014;Scott, Morgan, Plotnikoff, & Lubans, 2015). Nevertheless, they do not cover all facets of a construct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An online questionnaire was used to collect data regarding student's sex, primary language, and their self‐reported lifestyle behaviors and intentions. The questionnaire items were based on previously validated items and are provided in Appendix S1 (Supporting information). The following categories of primary language spoken by parents of students were used to broadly classify students according to language background: English, Asian, Middle Eastern, or other .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em relação ao questionário de atividade física, para o estudo de confiabilidade, o tamanho da amostra foi calculado usando α de Cronbach = 0,75; α = 0,05 e β = 0,20 (poder estatístico de 80%) (52,53). Para o estudo de validade, os parâmetros foram os seguintes: coeficiente de correlação, r = 0,50; α = 0.05 e β = 0,20 (poder estatístico de 80%) (52,53). Com base nestes parêmetros, o tamanho de amostra projetada foi de 120 participantes para o estudo de confiabilidade e 83 para o estudo de validade.…”
Section: Amostraunclassified