1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3182(12)80430-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of a scale for evaluating dietitians' interviewing skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…‘Rapport’, ‘partnership’ and ‘collaboration’ were embedded as components of assessment tools and practice models. ‘Rapport’ formed part of two different assessment tools, one that evaluated dietitians' interviewing skills 46 and another that evaluated their communication skills 95 . Rapport was also described as part of a nutrition‐counselling model 52 and trialled within a scale that measured dietitians' confidence working with clients managing psychological conditions 31 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘Rapport’, ‘partnership’ and ‘collaboration’ were embedded as components of assessment tools and practice models. ‘Rapport’ formed part of two different assessment tools, one that evaluated dietitians' interviewing skills 46 and another that evaluated their communication skills 95 . Rapport was also described as part of a nutrition‐counselling model 52 and trialled within a scale that measured dietitians' confidence working with clients managing psychological conditions 31 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The psychometric properties reported within the literature indicate that the DIRS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing dieticians interviewing skills. Indeed, Gregory et al (1995) supported the questionnaire's inter‐rater reliability reporting an acceptable κ coefficient of 0.67. In addition, the authors reported that following rigorous procedural checks regarding the content, concurrent, and discriminant validity, the DIRS was deemed suitably valid as a measure of dietician's interviewing skills in clinical settings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is also a need for an appropriate validated tool to be available for use. There have been attempts to develop suitable assessment tools (55)(56)(57) all of which have demonstrated good content validity, that is the extent to which a panel of experts believe that the items included examine comprehensively, or represent a wellbalanced sample of, the content domain to be measured (58) . In this case the content domain is the use of CSBC in dietetic one-to-one consultations.…”
Section: Assessment Of Communication Skills For Behaviour Change In Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the content domain is the use of CSBC in dietetic one-to-one consultations. However all of these research teams recognised the need for further development before their tools could be used to assess the skills of dietitians with confidence (55)(56)(57) . More recently Whitehead et al (54) have developed and validated a tool, DIET-COMMS, for this purpose.…”
Section: Assessment Of Communication Skills For Behaviour Change In Dmentioning
confidence: 99%