Reliability and validity of Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) for evaluating foot posture in participants with low back pain

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) is a valid and moderately reliable tool to evaluate foot posture. However, data about reliability and validity of FPI-6 in the assessment of foot posture in people with low back pain (LBP) is lacking.Objectives: To investigate reliability and validity of FPI-6 in the assessment of foot posture in people with LBP.Methods: Thirty volunteers with LBP, aged 20 - 64 years, were recruited for the research and assessed by two raters. The data measured by different raters on the same day were used to calculate the inter-rater reliability. The data measured by the same rater on different dates were used to calculate the test-retest reliability. The reliability of FPI-6 was tested with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability with standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland–Altman analysis. The validity of FPI-6 was tested with Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Spearman's correlation coefficients. Results: The FPI-6 indicated excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability in the evaluation of foot posture in people with LBP (ICC = 0.97 and 0.95). The agreement for inter-rater and test-retest was excellent based on the SEM (SEM = 0.12) and MDC value (MDC = 0.33). Bland–Altman plots showed that there was no significant systematic bias for the agreement on the ground of low mean difference (< 1). The EFA suggested that the fit indices were considered acceptable according to the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value (KMO = 0.620) and Bartlett's sphericity test (P < 0.01). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between each item and total score of FPI-6 because the Spearman’s correlation coefficient of six items were all > 0.3 (P < 0.01).Conclusions: The inter-rater and test-retest reliability and validity of FPI-6 on people with LBP were proved reliable. It might be considered a reliable and valid adjunctive tool to detect possible changes of foot posture after interventions in patients with LBP.

Prevalence of Foot Pronation in General Population of Surat City

“…The selection of Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) is because it is proved to be the most relevant for evaluating foot posture which includes six components for evaluation that is found on three-dimensional observations and also gives detailed quantitative data of foot postural variation. (10) There are several studies in different countries about the prevalence of flat foot with the help of the Foot Posture Index among various populations. Studies have been carried out among general population, traffic police, physiotherapy students.…”