2020
DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1819449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of pediatric powered mobility outcome measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basic steering control is demonstrated at phase 6 and at phase 7 they can use the power mobility device to participate in other activities. The ALP has established validity for a wide range of ages and abilities and inter-rater reliability has recently been established between experienced professionals (ICC 2,1 0.83) [66] and between professionals and relatives or assistants (κ w 0.85) [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Basic steering control is demonstrated at phase 6 and at phase 7 they can use the power mobility device to participate in other activities. The ALP has established validity for a wide range of ages and abilities and inter-rater reliability has recently been established between experienced professionals (ICC 2,1 0.83) [66] and between professionals and relatives or assistants (κ w 0.85) [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good inter-rater reliability (κ w 0.87) and fair intra-rater reliability (κ w 0.52) was reported from repeated assessment of 9 children with physical disabilities in the original study [30]. Recently other researchers reported excellent intra-rater (ICC 2,1 0.97/0.98) and good to excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC 2,1 0.93/0.87) from assessment of 30 children over two occasions [66]. It has been widely used in paediatric power mobility research although concerns remain regarding its structure and content [54].…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The ALP includes eight phases from novice (ALP 1) to expert (ALP 8). It has evidence of face and content validity (Nilsson and Durkin, 2014) as well as good inter-rater reliability (ICC 2,1 0.83 (Gefen et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMP has been used in research for children with CP up to the age of 18 years (Gefen et al, 2019a) and shows good-to-excellent interrater reliability (0.87) and excellent intrarater reliability (0.97) (Furumasu et al, 1996). It is the most frequently cited measure in pediatric powered mobility studies (Field & Livingstone, 2018), has been translated into Hebrew, and has good-to-excellent validity and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.97-0.98) (Gefen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ALP uses an ordinal scale of 1-8 with 8 as the highest score and is suitable from age 12 months on (Nilsson, 2007;Nilsson & Durkin, 2014). The ALP and its Hebrew translation have good interrater reliability (0.83), and convergent validity with the PMP (r s = 0.89) (Gefen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%