2003
DOI: 10.2310/6640.2003.37854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity of Single Inclinometer Measurements for Thoracic Spine Range of Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kyphosis was determined through the inclinometer methods previously described by (Lee et al, 2003;Lewis & Valentine, 2010). The hypothesised reason for this decreased neutral kyphosis may be due to the activity requirements of surfing with approximately 50% of a surfing session spent in the prone position paddling (Farley et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kyphosis was determined through the inclinometer methods previously described by (Lee et al, 2003;Lewis & Valentine, 2010). The hypothesised reason for this decreased neutral kyphosis may be due to the activity requirements of surfing with approximately 50% of a surfing session spent in the prone position paddling (Farley et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participant then maximally extended their spine by pointing their elbows upwards with the amount of thoracic mobility recorded on the inclinometer or HALO (D in Figure 2). T1/2 was chosen as the landmark for this assessment method as it has previously been used for measuring thoracic mobility in the sagittal plane (Lee et al, 2003;O'Gorman & Jull, 1987). It needs to be noted that the HALO method does not distinguish between lumbar or thoracic movement and is considered to assess thoracolumbar mobility in the sagittal plane.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We undertook a systematic review of published research, which reported on sitting posture measurement tools. We identified nine relevant papers describing only three measurement approaches (goniometer [ 17 - 19 ], inclinometer [ 20 - 23 ] and flexicurve [ 24 , 25 ]). None of these approaches has been validated for adolescents (high school students).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%