2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13760-017-0843-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of telephonic Barthel Index: an experience from multi-centric randomized control study

Abstract: Telephonic Barthel Index (BI) assessment is less time-consuming and more feasible than a face-to-face interview. The aim of this study was to test the validity as well as reliability of the BI administered by telephone in comparison with face-to-face assessment in a multi-centric study. The study was conducted during the course of a randomized controlled trial in which 120 patients with subacute strokes from five teaching hospitals from different parts of India were recruited. Central telephonic follow-up and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the telephone Barthel index (BI) has been found to have robust reliability and validity. 10,11 Function was assessed using the BI. 12 The BI considers independence in 10 ADLs: feeding, toilet use, bowel and bladder control, grooming, dressing, bathing, mobility, stair climbing, and transfers (from bed to chair and back).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the telephone Barthel index (BI) has been found to have robust reliability and validity. 10,11 Function was assessed using the BI. 12 The BI considers independence in 10 ADLs: feeding, toilet use, bowel and bladder control, grooming, dressing, bathing, mobility, stair climbing, and transfers (from bed to chair and back).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow‐up interviews were conducted in person or by telephone. Notably, the telephone Barthel index (BI) has been found to have robust reliability and validity 10,11 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the phone call, all patients were assessed using the MBI [ 22 , 23 ] and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) [ 24 , 25 ]. A specific questionnaire for RTW was also administered, together with questions related to any organizational or physical adaptations applied for the workplace.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are five tools (Sinhala version of ADL[42], Modified Barthel index[43], EASI[44], EASY Care[20], modified Bristol and Blessed scales[45]) were validated for ADL assessment. Among them, Sinhala version of ADL[42] and EASY Care[20] independence scale had high reliability, Whereas Modified Barthel index[43], substantial-high sensitivity and specificity, EASI[44] tool had shown moderate sensitivity and high specificity, with a poor PPV and the modified Bristol and Blessed scales[45] had very high sensitivity and moderate specificity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large majority of studies were from India (34) followed by Sri Lanka (5), Nepal (3), Bangladesh (2) and Pakistan (2). All these studies were conducted in rural, urban or semi-urban settings except 3 studies(55)(52)(57). 32 tools were reported in regional language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%