2000
DOI: 10.1177/002221940003300306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire

Abstract: The reliability and validity of a revised version of Finucci's (1982) Reading History Questionnaire was examined in two adult samples. One sample included 84 adults from an ongoing study of familial dyslexia, and a second sample was composed of parents of 107 children from a longitudinal study of reading development. Internal consistency was demonstrated by Cronbach's alphas of .94 and .92 in the two samples. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated by significant correlations (.87 and .84 in the two samples) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
235
0
13

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
235
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The adult mathematical history questionnaire (AMHQ) described here is modelled after the adult reading history questionnaire (ARHQ) 12 . The AMHQ consists of six questions, each scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adult mathematical history questionnaire (AMHQ) described here is modelled after the adult reading history questionnaire (ARHQ) 12 . The AMHQ consists of six questions, each scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores on the adult reading history questionnaire (ARHQ) 11,12 and adult mathematical history questionnaire (AMHQ) questionnaires (see Methods), designed to detect a history of reading and mathematics learning difficulties indicative of dyslexia and dyscalculia, separate the control neuropsychiatric CNV carriers from population controls with an effect of 0.50 s.d. (P 5 3.1 3 10 26 ) and 0.55 s.d.…”
Section: The Neuropsychiatric Cnvs As a Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants completed a battery of reading and cognitive tests for dyslexia, described below. In addition, participants completed the Portuguese adaptation of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire (QHL; Lefly & Pennington, 2000), which is a reliable tool for dyslexia screening (Alves & Castro, 2004). Written informed consent was provided for each participant in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full-scale IQ (FIQ) was normal to above average for all participants with a mean of 121 ± 8.2 and a range from 105 to 134. Additional assessments of reading and spelling were acquired: the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) 2nd edition (Torgesen et al 1999), Phonemic Decoding and Sight Word Efficiency subtests (PDE and SWE), the Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) (Lefly and Pennington 2000), the Woodcock-Johnson IIIA Spelling subtest (WJ-SP) (McGrew and Woodcock 2001), Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) of Numbers (RAN-N) and Letters (RAN-L) (Wolf and Denckla 2005), the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test (WRMT) (Woodcock 1987, 25), and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) (Dunn and Dunn 1997). Detailed participant characteristics are provided in Table 1, where we note the number of participants who scored below 90 (bottom 25th percentile) or above 110 (upper 25th percentile) on standardized reading measures.…”
Section: Participants and Cognitive Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%