2016
DOI: 10.1177/1756285616673515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Attributional Style Questionnaire- Survey in people with multiple sclerosis

Abstract: Background:The current study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of an attributional style measure that can be administered remotely, to people who have multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: A total of 495 participants with MS were recruited. Participants completed the Attributional Style Questionnaire-Survey (ASQ-S) and two comparison measures of cognitive variables via postal survey on three occasions, each 12 months apart. Internal reliability, testretest reliability and congruent validity were conside… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially if participants were also experiencing burnout, self‐selection out of the study sample could be possible. In addition, the format of the ASQ‐General Use questionnaire has been criticized by some as unclear and time‐consuming, and has been implicated with propensity for missing data, especially via online administration (Kneebone & Dewar, 2017). Future research with the ASQ‐General Use could focus on further scale modification to enhance usability and minimize the likelihood of missing data, especially in an online format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially if participants were also experiencing burnout, self‐selection out of the study sample could be possible. In addition, the format of the ASQ‐General Use questionnaire has been criticized by some as unclear and time‐consuming, and has been implicated with propensity for missing data, especially via online administration (Kneebone & Dewar, 2017). Future research with the ASQ‐General Use could focus on further scale modification to enhance usability and minimize the likelihood of missing data, especially in an online format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, face validity is used FIRM Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 6(2), September, 2021 ∎ 189 to be a valid measure of a given variable or construct (Kneebon & Dewar, 2016). The content of this research adopts measurement from previous research and adjusted the questionnaire to be matched with the research topic.…”
Section: A Validity and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the 10 factors ranged from 0.61 to 0.76. After setting the minimum stability value of 0.70 [29], factor 10-with a stability value of 0.61-was revised.…”
Section: Phase 2: Condensation Of the Noss According To Validity And mentioning
confidence: 99%