2016
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) in adults with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)

Abstract: IntroductionSignificant impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease have been previously described. The disease-specific HRQL among patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), however, remains unknown.AimTo determine the degree of construct validity of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) in adults with NASH.MethodsParticipants referred for the evaluation of histology-proven NASH at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 1996 and 2000, were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
70
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, patients with NAFLD have impaired health-related quality of life. The scores of physical and mental domains in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire and Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire have been observed to be low in patients with NAFLD, including patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), compared to the general population or to patients with hepatitis B [79]. These results imply that NAFLD patients have depressive state even without apparent depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, patients with NAFLD have impaired health-related quality of life. The scores of physical and mental domains in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire and Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire have been observed to be low in patients with NAFLD, including patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), compared to the general population or to patients with hepatitis B [79]. These results imply that NAFLD patients have depressive state even without apparent depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its clinical impact, NAFLD has an impact on patient‐reported outcomes . In fact, recent data suggest that NAFLD patients may have significant impairment of their physical health as measured by two patient‐reported quality‐of‐life measurement tools, the Short Form‐36 and the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire . Finally, NAFLD has been shown to have an important economic impact on health care use .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16) In fact, recent data suggest that NAFLD patients may have significant impairment of their physical health as measured by two patient-reported quality-of-life measurement tools, the Short Form-36 and the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire. (17) Finally, NAFLD has been shown to have an important economic impact on health care use. (16) In a recent study of Medicare NAFLD patients, the mean yearly inflation-adjusted charges from the outpatient setting increased from $2,624 6 $3,308 in 2005 to $3,608 6 $5,132 in 2010, in dollars of 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to CLDQ for patients with liver disease, there are now fully validated HRQL instruments for patients with HCV (CLDQ‐HCV), primary sclerosing cholangitis, or NASH (CLDQ NAFLD‐NASH) . For patients with NAFLD and NASH, the recently developed and validated CLDQ NAFLD‐NASH scoring system contains 36 items divided into four domains with good psychometric properties . CLDQ NAFLD‐NASH was developed using a systematic approach with exhaustive item selection through literature search, patient interviews, focus groups and experts' input.…”
Section: Prosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(27,(34)(35)(36) For patients with NAFLD and NASH, the recently developed and validated CLDQ NAFLD-NASH scoring system contains 36 items divided into four domains with good psychometric properties. (35,44) CLDQ NAFLD-NASH was developed using a systematic approach with exhaustive item selection through literature search, patient interviews, focus groups and experts' input. This scoring system then underwent systematic item reduction and factor analysis and has been shown to have excellent reliability, validity and responsiveness.…”
Section: Work Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%