2020
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS)

Abstract: Summary Background The associations between disease activity and several clinical signs in vitiligo have been described, but a widely accepted and validated scoring system is lacking. Objectives To validate the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) for physicians. Methods Three visible clinical signs were scored on 15 body locations: confetti‐like depigmentation (c), Koebner phenomenon (k) and hypochromic areas/borders (h). The inter‐ and intrarater reliability of the global VSAS and VSAS subscores (c‐VSAS, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical markers of active, progressive disease should be thought and include: the Koebner phenomenon, inflammatory lesions, trichrome lesions, and confetti‐like depigmentation (Figure 3) 34,127,173–175 . The Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS), which is a composite score based on the presence of confetti‐like depigmentation, Koebner phenomenon and hypochromic areas/borders in 15 body areas, is a reliable instrument to score visible clinical signs linked to disease activity and was recently validated 179 . Treatment for at least 2–3 months is needed to determine its efficacy.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical markers of active, progressive disease should be thought and include: the Koebner phenomenon, inflammatory lesions, trichrome lesions, and confetti‐like depigmentation (Figure 3) 34,127,173–175 . The Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS), which is a composite score based on the presence of confetti‐like depigmentation, Koebner phenomenon and hypochromic areas/borders in 15 body areas, is a reliable instrument to score visible clinical signs linked to disease activity and was recently validated 179 . Treatment for at least 2–3 months is needed to determine its efficacy.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no standardized method to evaluate repigmentation objectively. [42][43][44] Other validated tools, such as Vitiligo Extent Score, recommended by the International Initiative for Outcomes for vitiligo could be used instead. 23,27,33,36,43 Finally, none of the studies evaluated the relevant selfassessment outcomes such as subjective improvement, patients' treatment expectations, quality of life, tolerability, and burden of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 This tool is used to assess the cosmetic acceptability of repigmentation in patients with vitiligo. 25,44 Multiple therapies for vitiligo are currently available. 4,45 OMP therapy needs to be standardized so that dermatologists can offer an alternative treatment for this difficult to treat disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) segmental or non-segmental vitiligo; (ii) stable diseases over at least 1 year; (iii) failure with non-surgical interventions over at least 6 months; and (iv) absence of confetti-like depigmentation, tri-or hypochromic areas, and type B Koebner phenomenon. 12 In total, 50 patients were enrolled. Two patches were selected from each patient and were randomly allocated to the epidermal orientation and dermal orientation groups.…”
Section: Clinical Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%