2015
DOI: 10.17795/ijpbs-233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity of the Farsi Version of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale

Abstract: Background:The somatosensory amplification scale (SSAS) is a 10-item self-report instrument designed to assess a tendency to experience normal somatic and visceral sensations as intense, noxious, and disturbing.Objectives:The present study investigated the reliability and validity of the SSAS, developed by Barsky et al. (1988), in the Iranian population.Materials and Methods:The study was carried out on 240 patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders and 30 healthy persons selected by convenience sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the , the SSAS had appropriate test-retest reliability (r = 0.79; p < 0.0001), internal consistency (α = 0.82), and validity. The findings confirmed the reliability and validity of the SSAS in Iranian (Aghayousefi et al, 2015), Japanese (Nakao et al, 2001), and Turkish (Güleç and Sayar, are the most important mechanisms in cognitive behavioural model of health anxiety. Moreover, considering the studies by Barsky and Ahern (2004), Greeven et al (2007), Hedman et al (2016), Salkovskis et al (2003), Seivewright et al (2008), Sørensen et al (2011), andSumathipala et al (2008), it can be assumed that cognitive behavioural intervention can be effective in healthy individuals with COVID-19 anxiety.…”
Section: Outcome Measuressupporting
confidence: 69%
“…According to the , the SSAS had appropriate test-retest reliability (r = 0.79; p < 0.0001), internal consistency (α = 0.82), and validity. The findings confirmed the reliability and validity of the SSAS in Iranian (Aghayousefi et al, 2015), Japanese (Nakao et al, 2001), and Turkish (Güleç and Sayar, are the most important mechanisms in cognitive behavioural model of health anxiety. Moreover, considering the studies by Barsky and Ahern (2004), Greeven et al (2007), Hedman et al (2016), Salkovskis et al (2003), Seivewright et al (2008), Sørensen et al (2011), andSumathipala et al (2008), it can be assumed that cognitive behavioural intervention can be effective in healthy individuals with COVID-19 anxiety.…”
Section: Outcome Measuressupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The original SSAS has been translated into multiple languages and has shown good internal consistency and test-retest repeatability. 26,33,34 The sum of the 7-items had a total possible score ranging from 7 to 35, where higher scores indicate higher non-noxious somatosensory amplification. Scores were categorized into sex-specific quartiles, as women typically report higher multisensory sensitivity than men, 11,24 enabling high vs low somatosensory amplification comparisons while adjusting for sex differences.…”
Section: Multisensory Sensitivity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, pain acceptance is not about ignoring pain or increasing behavioral activity to control pain, but rather a behavioral change that entails better daily functioning despite the presence of pain (11). According to research, pain acceptance leads to increased resilience and quality of life for patients (12,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%