2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Electroencephalography Biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both groups, single-pulse TMS determined several early (<100 ms) voltage deflections >5 μv ( Figure 1 ), which is consistent with effective cortical stimulation [ 30 , 49 ]. In addition, the relatively low amplitude of late (>100 ms) TEP components suggested an effective suppression of “off-target” auditory artifacts [ 38 , 44 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In both groups, single-pulse TMS determined several early (<100 ms) voltage deflections >5 μv ( Figure 1 ), which is consistent with effective cortical stimulation [ 30 , 49 ]. In addition, the relatively low amplitude of late (>100 ms) TEP components suggested an effective suppression of “off-target” auditory artifacts [ 38 , 44 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, no statistically significant differences have been found for M1-P15 amplitude and latency between the contracted and the relaxed ipsilateral hand (Zazio et al, 2022). Therefore, these data suggest that M1-P15 amplitude can be measured with high stability at a single subject level and meet crucial criteria for developing cortico-cortical connectivity-based biomarkers (Julkunen et al, 2022;Parmigiani et al, 2022), provided the same TMS parameters of the original studies (Bortoletto et al, 2021;Zazio et al, 2022). Further studies will be needed to understand if these results can be generalized to different target areas and other TEP components, as previous works have reported inconsistencies in replicability (de Goede et al, 2020;Kerwin et al, 2018), which may also depend on signal preprocessing (Bertazzoli et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Most importantly, future work should also explore whether this experimental approach can be used for real-time measurement of monitoring the neural effects of TMS trains. If successful, this real-time approach has important implications in developing closed-loop adaptive TMS treatments 59 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%