2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability-based evaluation of the inherent safety presumptions in common fire safety design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concrete parameters are listed in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, these statistical parameters are selected based on the Chinese Code (GB2010), BS(2004) and the research of Cai(2016) and (Coile et al,2014). To measure the errors of the analysis caused by different loading values, the following load ratio was introduced:…”
Section: Statistical Parameters Of the Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concrete parameters are listed in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, these statistical parameters are selected based on the Chinese Code (GB2010), BS(2004) and the research of Cai(2016) and (Coile et al,2014). To measure the errors of the analysis caused by different loading values, the following load ratio was introduced:…”
Section: Statistical Parameters Of the Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the available probabilistic approaches, the development of fragility curves has been found to be popular among researchers as it is conceptually easy to understand and allows faster design iterations [5]. Although available probabilistic methodologies, such as the development of fire fragility curves, can contribute to enable a safe and reliable design for fire exposed structures [2][3][4][5][6], their implementation has been found arduous and computationally challenging. The commonly large computational demand can mainly be attributed to the multi-step calculation procedure required for fire analysis of structures, together with the need for a large number of structural evaluations for probabilistic estimations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly large computational demand can mainly be attributed to the multi-step calculation procedure required for fire analysis of structures, together with the need for a large number of structural evaluations for probabilistic estimations. For instance, the Monte Carlo approach adopted for reliability assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) slabs by Van Coile et al [6] involves about 10,000 structural evaluations, demonstrating substantial computational demand. A similar difficulty can be observed in the probabilistic studies carried out by Guo et al, and Hopkin et al [7][8] for the probabilistic evaluation of protected steel elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability-based structural fire engineering has progressed in recent years. Examples in the literature include the application of the Monte Carlo method and various variable reduction techniques to determine the probability of failure and/ or the reliability of both protected and unprotected elements [11], to evaluate the behaviour of steel beams under fire, taking account of uncertainties in the fire load [12], to evaluate designs carried out according to EN 1992-1-2, and to study the influence of the input variables for a slab the ISO 834 standard fire [13]. A new set of fire resistance periods in the development of codes of practice DD9999 were developed in [14], and a risk based methodology was defined, while the fundamental design challenges in the context of time equivalence were addressed in [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%