2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(02)00287-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
166
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 443 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
166
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the significant reduction of the computational time, the method is still time consuming and, for this reason, several variance reduction techniques, such as importance sampling or directional simulation, have been widely applied. An extensive description, as well as, numerical examples of the use of ANN-based MCS in structural reliability can be found in ( [31], [32], [27], [33], [34]). …”
Section: Ann-based Methods Of Failure Probability Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the significant reduction of the computational time, the method is still time consuming and, for this reason, several variance reduction techniques, such as importance sampling or directional simulation, have been widely applied. An extensive description, as well as, numerical examples of the use of ANN-based MCS in structural reliability can be found in ( [31], [32], [27], [33], [34]). …”
Section: Ann-based Methods Of Failure Probability Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, many of the model parameters are statistically and/or physically dependent and their mathematical representations are of a nonlinear nature. Consequently, the ( ) function and the failure domain cannot be easily expressed or approximated by an analytical model (Papadrakakis and Lagaros 2002;.…”
Section: Probability Of Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of random variables increases and the problem becomes more complex, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation-based methods are found to be more reliable (Papadrakakis and Lagaros 2002). In each MC realisation, ( ) is evaluated for each segment of the structure and failure is defined by the violation of ( ) for any segment, i.e., failure is when the minimum of ( ), for all segments, is ≤ 0.…”
Section: Probability Of Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development, over the last two decades [1], on the stochastic analysis methods has stimulated the interest for probabilistic structural optimization problems. There are two distinguished design formulations to account for the probabilistic systems response: Robust Design Optimization (RDO) [2][3][4] and Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) [5][6][7][8]. RDO formulations primarily seek to minimize the influence of stochastic variations on the mean design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%