2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Comparative Analysis of Codes for the Design of Cantilever Sheet Pile Walls: Basis for Studying the Principles of International Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commonly used RWs include the gravity RWs [1,2], which rely on the balance between the self-weight of the RW and the earth pressure to maintain the stability of the wall and have disadvantages including long construction periods and poor greening function; gabion RWs [3,4], which are flexible gravity retaining structures formed by stacking gabion cages containing various grades of stone in an orderly manner; reinforced earth RWs [5,6], which are formed by adding steel bars in the soil to stabilize the soil by the friction between the steel bars and the soil, but their construction quality is greatly affected by the construction site factors and slope surfaces are required to be gentle; cantilever/counterfort RWs [7,8], which maintain stability by the weight of the fill on the bottom plate but have the disadvantages of complex construction technology, long construction periods, and excessive corrosion of drain pipes; and sheet pile walls [9][10][11], which uses baffles to block the soil between the deeply buried piles and they have similar disadvantages to those of the cantilever/counterfort RWs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The commonly used RWs include the gravity RWs [1,2], which rely on the balance between the self-weight of the RW and the earth pressure to maintain the stability of the wall and have disadvantages including long construction periods and poor greening function; gabion RWs [3,4], which are flexible gravity retaining structures formed by stacking gabion cages containing various grades of stone in an orderly manner; reinforced earth RWs [5,6], which are formed by adding steel bars in the soil to stabilize the soil by the friction between the steel bars and the soil, but their construction quality is greatly affected by the construction site factors and slope surfaces are required to be gentle; cantilever/counterfort RWs [7,8], which maintain stability by the weight of the fill on the bottom plate but have the disadvantages of complex construction technology, long construction periods, and excessive corrosion of drain pipes; and sheet pile walls [9][10][11], which uses baffles to block the soil between the deeply buried piles and they have similar disadvantages to those of the cantilever/counterfort RWs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigations on the load-bearing characteristics of sheet pile walls include the study of Mattos et al [9], who evaluated several limit equilibrium design methods available in international standards and manuals using the suggested probabilistic design procedure based on multiphase Monte Carlo simulations. The results revealed that the safety coefficient and soil/wall friction significantly affect the relative conservativeness of these design methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%