2018
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.4481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability, failure detection and prevention in cyber‐physical systems (CPSs) with agents

Abstract: Summary The complexity of cyber‐physical systems (CPSs) opens up several challenges regarding the assurance of high levels of reliability. Therefore, we need to develop a new data quality analysis and new CPS components/subsystems for the detection, isolation, recovery, and prevention of failures and intrusion events. Furthermore, we have to develop new reliability assessment models and metrics in order to properly evaluate CPSs. Agent technologies, through their characteristics such as autonomy, social abilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, each one of these properties are found in a different superconcept of the solution, which means that they are not associated. Finally, the reliability and availability properties are provided through an ontological solution for detecting and preventing the failures of the system components of Cyber Physical Systems (CPS) [36]. An ontology is used with all the CPS failures described in order to assist a multi-agent architecture to detect and identify the potential failures.…”
Section: Safety Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, each one of these properties are found in a different superconcept of the solution, which means that they are not associated. Finally, the reliability and availability properties are provided through an ontological solution for detecting and preventing the failures of the system components of Cyber Physical Systems (CPS) [36]. An ontology is used with all the CPS failures described in order to assist a multi-agent architecture to detect and identify the potential failures.…”
Section: Safety Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since confidentiality is a subproperty of dependability according to ENISA, it is possible to find ontologies that consider confidentiality for CPS in ontologies that concern all attributes of dependability. In [36], an ontology that concerns all attributes of dependability is used to consider various failures.…”
Section: Confidentiality Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on fault management in CPS, Sanislav et al propose a multi‐agent–based solution, called ReliaCPS, to detect and prevent failures of the system components in complex CPS deployments. In fact, reliability is a challenging but core and essential requirement for any CPS.…”
Section: Main Topics and Papers At A Glancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The list of the papers of the special issue is provided . At this point, we want to thank all the people involved in the effort of producing this issue, starting from the submitting authors, to the team of enthusiastic reviewers who have provided useful suggestions to authors.…”
Section: Conclusion and Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the Markov chain state transition diagram to model the behavior of sensors. In order to avoid sensor failure in a CPS, Teodora et al [6,7] presented a multi-agent architecture approach, which introduced four types of agents: data processing and diagnostics, diagnosis agent, data processing agent for prevention, and prevention agent. They monitored the behavior of the system and when some failure or maintenance event occurred, the agents analyzed the event and responded by using a knowledge base (KB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%