2022
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2021.3126587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Improvement on SRAM Physical Unclonable Function (PUF) Using an 8T Cell in 28 nm FDSOI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For uniqueness, PUFs and RNGs require high uniqueness, 0.5 of the Hamming distance. For example, according to a paper, 26) the measured HD of the SRAM array is approximately 0.485-0.497. Although SRAM array is used for PUFs and RNGs, the quality of the randomness requires improvement.…”
Section: Proposed Arwgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For uniqueness, PUFs and RNGs require high uniqueness, 0.5 of the Hamming distance. For example, according to a paper, 26) the measured HD of the SRAM array is approximately 0.485-0.497. Although SRAM array is used for PUFs and RNGs, the quality of the randomness requires improvement.…”
Section: Proposed Arwgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed ARWG is discussed and compared with physically unclonable functions (PUFs) and RNGs in terms of their use, function, and randomness. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The randomness of random weights generated by the proposed ARWG is analyzed with device and circuit variations. Furthermore, the requirements of random weights from RC and random weight SNN are evaluated by Hamming distance and Hamming weight, which are indicators of repeatability and uniqueness of the randomness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%