2014
DOI: 10.5935/medicalexpress.2014.02.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Index of inter- and intra-rater of manual goniometry and computerized biophotogrammetry to assess the range of motion of internal and external shoulder rotation

Abstract: Measurements of the joint angles of the shoulder complex are important for diagnosis, assessment and monitoring of the treatment progression of movement disorders, provided that they can be seen as valid and reliable. The object of this study was to determine inter-and intra-rater reliability of manual goniometry and computerized biophotogrammetry for the assessment of range of motion of the medial and lateral rotations of the shoulder. METHODS: Four evaluators (two for goniometry and two for biophotogrammetry… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three variables were used to assess the treatment technique's effectiveness: (i) pain intensity as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); (ii) shoulder range of motion as measured by a goniometer (shoulder abduction, flexion, and medial rotation); and (iii) functional disability as measured by SPADI (Shoulder pain disability index). The Visual Analog Scale [25], Manual goniometer [26], and SPADI are all reliable and valid techniques, as evidenced by previous studies [27]. On the first day (Day 1) and at the end of the first week (Day 5), VAS, goniometer, and SPADI were used to assess all 30 patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Three variables were used to assess the treatment technique's effectiveness: (i) pain intensity as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); (ii) shoulder range of motion as measured by a goniometer (shoulder abduction, flexion, and medial rotation); and (iii) functional disability as measured by SPADI (Shoulder pain disability index). The Visual Analog Scale [25], Manual goniometer [26], and SPADI are all reliable and valid techniques, as evidenced by previous studies [27]. On the first day (Day 1) and at the end of the first week (Day 5), VAS, goniometer, and SPADI were used to assess all 30 patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For spine pelvic parameters measurement reliability, the ICC of the measured parameters' value between evaluators 1 and 2 was calculated for each radiological examination. ICC results were defined as <.40, poor reliability; ≥.40 to <.80, good reliability; and ≥.80, excellent reliability based on a previous report 17) . P-values of <.05 were considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%