2022
DOI: 10.1002/qre.3216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability modeling for competing failure processes considering degradation rate variation under cumulative shock

Abstract: Most systems experience both random shocks (hard failure) and performance degradation (soft failure) during service span, and the dependence of the two competing failure processes has become a key issue. In this study, a novel dependent competing failure processes (DCFPs) model with a varying degradation rate is proposed. The comprehensive impact of random shocks, especially the effect of cumulative shock, is reasonably considered. Specifically, a shock will cause an abrupt degradation damage, and when the cum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study proposes a degradation model consisting of three primary components: normal degradation Xfalse(tfalse)$X( t )$, degradation resulting from internal shock damage Sfalse(tfalse)in$S{{( t )}_{in}}$, and degradation caused by external shock damage Sfalse(tfalse)ex$S{{( t )}_{ex}}$. Normal degradation Xfalse(tfalse)$X( t )$ represents a continuous, monotonically increasing process that can be effectively characterized using various degradation failure models such as Wiener processes, 35–37 gamma processes, 34 inverse Gaussian processes, 38 and others. Regardless of the specific model employed for normal degradation, it is essential to adhere to the principle of monotonic progression.…”
Section: Modeling Of Competitive Failure Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study proposes a degradation model consisting of three primary components: normal degradation Xfalse(tfalse)$X( t )$, degradation resulting from internal shock damage Sfalse(tfalse)in$S{{( t )}_{in}}$, and degradation caused by external shock damage Sfalse(tfalse)ex$S{{( t )}_{ex}}$. Normal degradation Xfalse(tfalse)$X( t )$ represents a continuous, monotonically increasing process that can be effectively characterized using various degradation failure models such as Wiener processes, 35–37 gamma processes, 34 inverse Gaussian processes, 38 and others. Regardless of the specific model employed for normal degradation, it is essential to adhere to the principle of monotonic progression.…”
Section: Modeling Of Competitive Failure Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have pointed out that there is a linear relationship between Yi${Y}_i$ and the shock amplitude Wi${W}_i$ of the damage shocks, and the cumulative degradation caused by the shocks becomes 49 S()tbadbreak=i=1N2()tYigoodbreak=γβ·i1N2()tWi$$\begin{equation}S\left( t \right) = \sum_{i = 1}^{{N}_2\left( t \right)} {{Y}_i} = {\gamma }_\beta \cdot \sum_{i - 1}^{{N}_2\left( t \right)} {{W}_i} \end{equation}$$where γβ${\gamma }_\beta $ is the proportional factor.…”
Section: Description Of the Dependent Competing Failure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dong et al 4 investigated reliability models for multi-component systems under stochastic deterioration process and generalized cumulative shocks with different damage effects. Wang et al 5 studied the reliability of a system with degradation rate variation under cumulative shocks. Li et al 6 modeled the reliability of a system with multi-stage degradation subjected to cumulative shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%