3D Flash Memories 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-7512-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of 3D NAND Flash Memories

Abstract: In this chapter the main reliability mechanisms affecting 3D NAND memories will be addressed, providing a comparison between 3D FG and 3D CT devices in terms of reliability and expected performances. Starting from an analysis of basic reliability issues related to both physical and architectural aspects affecting NAND memories, the specific physical mechanisms impacting the reliability of 2D CT NAND will be addressed. Then, a review of the main problems experimentally observed in different 3D CT cell concepts … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other recent works [23,31,78,80,92] report several differences of 3D NAND flash memory from planar NAND flash memory. These differences include (1) smaller program variation at high P/E cycle counts [80], (2) smaller program interference [80], (3) layer-to-layer process variation [92], (4) early retention loss [23,31,78], and (5) retention interference [23]. While prior works have reported on the existence of these errors, none of them provide a comprehensive characterization of all of the different errors using the same chips.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Other recent works [23,31,78,80,92] report several differences of 3D NAND flash memory from planar NAND flash memory. These differences include (1) smaller program variation at high P/E cycle counts [80], (2) smaller program interference [80], (3) layer-to-layer process variation [92], (4) early retention loss [23,31,78], and (5) retention interference [23]. While prior works have reported on the existence of these errors, none of them provide a comprehensive characterization of all of the different errors using the same chips.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other recent works use a methodology similar to ours to characterize 3D NAND devices based on different 3D NAND flash memory cell technologies (i.e., 3D floating-gate cell and 3D vertical gate cell) [38,94,95], which are less common than the 3D charge trap NAND flash memory cell technology that we test in this paper. Other recent works [23,31,78,80,92] report several differences of 3D NAND flash memory from planar NAND flash memory. These differences include (1) smaller program variation at high P/E cycle counts [80], (2) smaller program interference [80], (3) layer-to-layer process variation [92], (4) early retention loss [23,31,78], and (5) retention interference [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advent of three-dimensionally integrated NAND Flash (i.e., 3D NAND) [10] seemed to alleviate such a trade-off, but not the need for the DRAM to cope with the performance disparity between the host system and the SSD. Reliability is however still a concern [11].…”
Section: A Solid State Drives: the Limitations Of Nand Flashmentioning
confidence: 99%