2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256866.25747.b3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of 3D Reconstruction of the Spine of Mild Scoliotic Patients

Abstract: The reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine is acceptable, and this technique can be used for clinical studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spine 3D geometry is limited between T1 and S1 since cervical spine is not routinely captured. Validation of the accuracy and reproducibility of the 3D reconstruction method has been reported in previous studies [13][14][15] particularly the reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients [16]: the 95 % prediction limits for the intra-and interobserver errors in measurement were computed. 95 % prediction limits indicate the difference between two successive replicate measurements that would exceed approximately 5 % of the time due to an error of measurement.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spine 3D geometry is limited between T1 and S1 since cervical spine is not routinely captured. Validation of the accuracy and reproducibility of the 3D reconstruction method has been reported in previous studies [13][14][15] particularly the reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients [16]: the 95 % prediction limits for the intra-and interobserver errors in measurement were computed. 95 % prediction limits indicate the difference between two successive replicate measurements that would exceed approximately 5 % of the time due to an error of measurement.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For each of these patients, the effective outcome of the scoliosis, stable or progression was compared to the group initially assigned to the patient. The inter-and intra-observer reproducibility measurement (95 % precision) of Cobb angle with the EOS system is 2°f or mild scoliosis [16]. Therefore, the criterion for progression was an increase in the curve of 5°or more that was confirmed radiographically on two consecutive occasions or the initiation of brace treatment.…”
Section: Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that vertebral rotation measurement based on 3D reconstruction of conventional bidirectional X-ray images gives more accurate results as compared with all other methods [34]. On the other hand, segmental intervertebral rotation could also be evaluated based on 3D reconstructions [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 girls and 7 boys were included. The mean age at radiological examination was 11 [range [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. 10 were classified Risser 0 or 1, 7 were Risser 2, 8 were Risser 3 and 5 were Risser 4.…”
Section: Imaging Protocol and 3d Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods of 3D reconstruction of the spine have been validated in asymptomatic and scoliotic patients [10][11][12][13]. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the variability of the effect of brace treatment on the 3D shape of idiopathic scoliosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%