2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572004000400020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of a digital image method for measuring medial mandibular flexure in dentate subjects

Abstract: The present results show excellent intra-rater and good inter-rater reliability of this digital image method for measuring MMF in dentate subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same procedure was carried out three times and a mean width of the dental arch in each position was obtained. MMF in maximum opening (MMFO) and protrusion (MMFP) were calculated by subtracting the width of the respective arch from the value obtained at the resting position 22,23 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same procedure was carried out three times and a mean width of the dental arch in each position was obtained. MMF in maximum opening (MMFO) and protrusion (MMFP) were calculated by subtracting the width of the respective arch from the value obtained at the resting position 22,23 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an integrated analysis of the jaw muscles and their effects on functional response with regard to craniofacial morphology has never been conducted in a homogeneous population. Additionally, previous studies 22,23 have evaluated the maximal occlusal force using thicker sensor pads, which lead to a greater distance between antagonistic teeth. The results may therefore not be reliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single calibrated examiner, who was blind to occlusal force values and cephalometric data, performed all linear measurements and MMF calculations. Reliability tests of this method yielded intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) from 0.98 to 0.99, inter-rater ICC of 0.69 [17], and test-retest ICCs from 0.96 to 0.99 [14]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the digital measurement methods has been examined in previous studies. As expected, the intraobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.98) is more accurate than interobserver examination (0.69 and 0.65) [Shinkai et al, 2004;Rawlinson et al, 2005]. In this study, the Adobe Photoshop 7 was used to analyze the digital images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Digital CT and X-ray images or histological sections are frequently used to quantify the amount of bone formation [Mohr et al, 2003;Shinkai et al, 2004;Rawlinson et al, 2005] Image Solutions IMSOL, Standish, Wigan (UK), Image Science Software, Berlin (Germany) and Imagic Bildverarbeitung, Glattbrugg (Switzerland)]. The accuracy of the digital measurement methods has been examined in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%