1996
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(95)00137-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of aircraft structures under non-periodic inspection: a Bayesian approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using equation (28), which is introduced in the appendix, the reliability is calculated for a single inspection, and the results under different distribution parameters are presented in figure 7.…”
Section: Reliability Evaluation Of Structures For a Single Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using equation (28), which is introduced in the appendix, the reliability is calculated for a single inspection, and the results under different distribution parameters are presented in figure 7.…”
Section: Reliability Evaluation Of Structures For a Single Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current structural repair manuals and associated literature define structural inspection intervals and repair measures. However, in actual application, these inspection intervals are frequently observed to be relatively conservative, and repeated inspections notably amplify airline costs [25][26][27][28]. The traditional method employs actual damage size data captured in the service difficulty reports (SDRs) provided by airlines to ascertain the reliability function of a structure, depicting the statistical characteristics of its comprehensive damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the method introduced by Deodatis et al (1996), the likelihood function of the possible events concerning an element at the time of inspection, is determined from the historical information on all previous inspections since start-up. This determination is not possible if this information is incomplete.…”
Section: Conditional Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element model updating using measured system response has a wide range of applications in areas such as structural response prediction, structural control, structural health monitoring, reliability and risk assessment, etc. [1,2,3,4]. For a proper assessment of the updated model all uncertainties involved in the problem should be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%