2018
DOI: 10.1002/mus.26327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of bedside ultrasound of limb and diaphragm muscle thickness in critically ill children

Abstract: Muscle thickness is reliably measured using ultrasound by trained examiners in critically-ill children. Our approach detects atrophy >13% in limb and >38% in diaphragm muscles. The smaller detectable change in limb muscles is likely due to their greater thickness. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements were obtained in triplicate and averaged for analyses. Intra-rater reproducibility coefficient ( κ ) was 0.99 for biceps, quadriceps and tibialis, and 0.8 for diaphragm, supporting recent suggestions by our group and others that serial US may reliably assess muscle properties in children[2, 27, 28].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Measurements were obtained in triplicate and averaged for analyses. Intra-rater reproducibility coefficient ( κ ) was 0.99 for biceps, quadriceps and tibialis, and 0.8 for diaphragm, supporting recent suggestions by our group and others that serial US may reliably assess muscle properties in children[2, 27, 28].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We demonstrate high intra- and interrater ICCs for all SWLs and spectrally unmixed parameters except lipid, with good feasibility also for a less experienced examiner. This correlation is in the range of or even better than comparable handheld ultrasound systems [ [24] , [25] , [26] ], especially for muscle imaging applications [ [27] , [28] , [29] ]. The lower ICC values for lipid might be explainable by generally low lipid levels in healthy muscles, especially in comparable lean individuals [ 30 ], so that little variations in probe positioning may have high impact on signal quantifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As we performed an ultrasound on the only right side for a superior ultrasound window, unilateral pathologies like diaphragmatic eventration or palsy could be missed (left‐sided) or interfere with measurements (right‐sided). The need for special training and the interrater difference in ultrasound measurements are other limitations of ultrasound‐based diaphragmatic evaluation 26 . Also, diaphragmatic atrophy measured by ultrasound may not always translate into proportionate weakness; we did not perform any tests measuring the strength of diaphragmatic contraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%