2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of COP-based postural sway measures and age-related differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
203
5
22

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
21
203
5
22
Order By: Relevance
“…It represents an expression of the energy spent by the postural system to maintain balance [27]. Our result is in line with previous studies reporting mean sway velocity as the most reliable traditional parameter in adults and children [12,18,28,29]. In children aged 6-14 years, the sX value showed a moderate reliability in all conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It represents an expression of the energy spent by the postural system to maintain balance [27]. Our result is in line with previous studies reporting mean sway velocity as the most reliable traditional parameter in adults and children [12,18,28,29]. In children aged 6-14 years, the sX value showed a moderate reliability in all conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The most commonly applied statistic however, were the different forms of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). While most used models described originally by Shrout and Fleiss [13], others again employed modified versions [14]. About 30% (6/22) of the studies using the ICC failed to state the exact model used.…”
Section: The Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding authors of these studies were contacted in order to gather the missing information but only two replies [14,15] were received. Where ICC models were reported, the twoway random effect model (ICC2,1) was employed most often.…”
Section: The Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A survey of the PubMed MEDLINE database and a review article (Ruhe et al, 2010) shows that some articles (Corriveau et al, 2000;Lafond et al, 2004;Lin et al, 2008;Salavati et al, 2009;Santos et al, 2008) assessed the reliability of the force plate examination, considering only the intrasession variability, obtaining excellent results. The intersession reliability was the subject of a recent study by Perinetti et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%