2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13744-015-0331-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Degree-Day Models to Predict the Development Time of Plutella xylostella (L.) under Field Conditions

Abstract: The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), is a cosmopolitan pest of brassicaceous crops occurring in regions with highly distinct climate conditions. Several studies have investigated the relationship between temperature and P. xylostella development rate, providing degree-day models for populations from different geographical regions. However, there are no data available to date to demonstrate the suitability of such models to make reliable projections on the development time for this species in field c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research points to the caution needed when adopting the use of predictive models in areas in which they were not developed and tested, and highlights the many factors and their interrelationships that can affect model accuracy. The accuracy of growing degree-day accumulation models can vary considerably (Zahiri et al 2010;Marchioro et al 2015), as exemplified by our wide range of accuracy in predicting peak alfalfa weevil growth stage in this study, with the probability of overlap varying from 0.13 to 0.84. Despite their similarities, the three models tested here interacted uniquely with our temperature data and field parameters, and producers need to consider factors other than degree-day values alone when planning to implement alfalfa weevil control measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This research points to the caution needed when adopting the use of predictive models in areas in which they were not developed and tested, and highlights the many factors and their interrelationships that can affect model accuracy. The accuracy of growing degree-day accumulation models can vary considerably (Zahiri et al 2010;Marchioro et al 2015), as exemplified by our wide range of accuracy in predicting peak alfalfa weevil growth stage in this study, with the probability of overlap varying from 0.13 to 0.84. Despite their similarities, the three models tested here interacted uniquely with our temperature data and field parameters, and producers need to consider factors other than degree-day values alone when planning to implement alfalfa weevil control measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, this approach gives fairly accurate results within an intermediate temperature range, but lacks precision in describing temperatures close to the lower and upper development thresholds (Bonhomme, 2000; Moore and Remais, 2014; Molnár et al ., 2017). This can lead to unsatisfying projections on the development time under field conditions (Moore et al ., 2012; Marchioro et al ., 2015). Especially in light of global warming, with rising average temperatures and more and longer heat waves (ICCP, 2014), non-linear TCPs are considered more reliable for predictions of peak population levels (Damos and Savopoulou-Soultani, 2012; Molnár et al ., 2017; Rebaudo and Rabhi, 2018), which are essential for an optimal timing of direct control measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on the development time under field conditions (Moore et al, 2012;Marchioro et al, 2015). Especially in light of global warming, with rising average temperatures and more and longer heat waves (ICCP, 2014), non-linear TCPs are considered more reliable for predictions of peak population levels (Damos and Savopoulou-Soultani, 2012;Molnár et al, 2017;Rebaudo and Rabhi, 2018), which are essential for an optimal timing of direct control measures.…”
Section: Bulletin Of Entomological Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%