2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2019.103149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of infrared image analysis based on anatomical landmarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the selection of ROIs should not be underestimated, as it has been shown to influence the reliability of studies (Ring and Ammer, 2015). A number of protocols aiming to standardise ROI selection have been proposed, such as the Glamorgan protocol (Ammer, 2008), the use of anatomical landmarks or instrumenting participants with markers (Seixas et al, 2020), the use of automated standardised analysis, such as the hottest pixel and the surrounding 24 (Ludwig et al, 2014) or the hottest 5 pixels (Formenti et al, 2017). However, both protocols of Ludwig et al (2014) and Formenti et al (2017), create a bias towards analysing the hottest area and lose a high amount of information from the thermogram, negating the benefit of measuring a large skin surface area.…”
Section: Roi Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the selection of ROIs should not be underestimated, as it has been shown to influence the reliability of studies (Ring and Ammer, 2015). A number of protocols aiming to standardise ROI selection have been proposed, such as the Glamorgan protocol (Ammer, 2008), the use of anatomical landmarks or instrumenting participants with markers (Seixas et al, 2020), the use of automated standardised analysis, such as the hottest pixel and the surrounding 24 (Ludwig et al, 2014) or the hottest 5 pixels (Formenti et al, 2017). However, both protocols of Ludwig et al (2014) and Formenti et al (2017), create a bias towards analysing the hottest area and lose a high amount of information from the thermogram, negating the benefit of measuring a large skin surface area.…”
Section: Roi Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%