2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(01)00044-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of isometric muscle strength tests for the trunk, hands and shoulders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
84
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its common use, we could not find any studies reporting the reliability for pull-ups. Our handgrip test results using the Baseline hand dynamometer were consistent with those of authors 11,24 who reported ICCs of 0.85 to 0.98 using the Jamar dynamometer (Sammons Preston Rolyan, Bolingbrook, IL). In addition to its high reliability A B value, the handgrip test takes very little time to administer and does not result in significant muscular fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Despite its common use, we could not find any studies reporting the reliability for pull-ups. Our handgrip test results using the Baseline hand dynamometer were consistent with those of authors 11,24 who reported ICCs of 0.85 to 0.98 using the Jamar dynamometer (Sammons Preston Rolyan, Bolingbrook, IL). In addition to its high reliability A B value, the handgrip test takes very little time to administer and does not result in significant muscular fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A back dynamometer (Takei, Tokyo, Japan) was used in the two tests. In one study, isometric back flexion and extension test was found to be reliable (ICC = .93-.97) (Essendrop et al, 2001). (f) A force-velocity (F-v) test was performed for the legs on a cycle ergometer (Monark Ergomedics 874, Monark, Sweden).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The better of the trials was recorded as the maximal effort for each hand (Skinner, 2005). In one study, the test-retest reliability of this test was found to be high (ICC = .98) (Essendrop et al, 2001). (e) Isometric back and leg strength tests -Two tests were performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) with 30 seconds of recovery between attempts were conducted, and the highest value was recorded. Maximal force and the corresponding moment arm were registered (16). Furthermore, handgrip strength was measured with a handheld dynamometer (model 281111, Smedley, Tokyo, Japan).…”
Section: Maximal Voluntary Contractionmentioning
confidence: 99%