Reliability of last menstrual period recall, an early ultrasound and a Smartphone App in predicting date of delivery and classification of preterm and post-term births

Abstract

Background A reliable expected date of delivery (EDD) is important for pregnant women in planning for a safe delivery and critical for management of obstetric emergencies. We compared the accuracy of LMP recall, an early ultrasound (EUS) and a Smartphone App in predicting the EDD in South African pregnant women. We further evaluated the rates of preterm and post-term births based on using the different measures. Methods This is a retrospective sub-study of pregnant women enrolled in a randomized controlled trial between October 2017-December 2019. EDD and gestational age (GA) at delivery were calculated from EUS, LMP and Smartphone App. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25. A Bland–Altman plot was constructed to determine the limits of agreement between LMP and EUS. Results Three hundred twenty-five pregnant women who delivered at term (≥ 37 weeks by EUS) and without pregnancy complications were included in this analysis. Women had an EUS at a mean GA of 16 weeks and 3 days). The mean difference between LMP dating and EUS is 0.8 days with the limits of agreement 31.4–30.3 days (Concordance Correlation Co-efficient 0.835; 95%CI 0.802, 0.867). The mean(SD) of the marginal time distribution of the two methods differ significantly (p = 0.00187). EDDs were < 14 days of the actual date of delivery (ADD) for 287 (88.3%;95%CI 84.4–91.4), 279 (85.9%;95%CI 81.6–89.2) and 215 (66.2%;95%CI 60.9–71.1) women for EUS, Smartphone App and LMP respectively but overall agreement between EUS and LMP was only 46.5% using a five category scale for EDD-ADD with a kappa of .22. EUS 14–24 weeks and EUS < 14 weeks predicted EDDs < 14 days of ADD in 88.1% and 79.3% of women respectively. The proportion of births classified as preterm (< 37 weeks) was 9.9% (95%CI 7.1–13.6) by LMP and 0.3% (95%CI 0.1–1.7) by Smartphone App. The proportion of post-term (> 42 weeks gestation) births was 11.4% (95%CI 8.4–15.3), 1.9% (95%CI 0.9–3.9) and 3.4% (95%CI 1.9–5.9) by LMP, EUS and Smartphone respectively. Conclusions EUS and Smartphone App were the most accurate to estimate the EDD in pregnant women. LMP-based dating resulted in misclassification of a significantly greater number of preterm and post-term deliveries compared to EUS and the Smartphone App.

Transcerebellar Diameter: an effective tool in estimating gestational age

“…Moreover, exact gestational age is likewise significant to circumvent redundant obstetric interventions during the pregnancy and delivery 18 . Gestational age is calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP) according to Naegele's rule 19 . Nevertheless, in nearly 40% of pregnancies the LMP is either not recognized or is not dependable.…”

Prevalence and associated risk factors of preterm and post-term births in Northern Ghana: a retrospective study in Savelugu Municipality

“…Northern Ethiopia (5) , and South Africa (25) at corresponding rates of 4.5%, 6.0%, and 11.4%. The differences could be explained in terms of demographic and geographical features of the study populations, as well as the timing of these studies.…”

Surveillance of ARV safety in pregnancy and breastfeeding: towards a new framework

“…Gestational age determination poses the greatest challenge for standardization and should be determined by second trimester ultrasound whenever possible [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. If not done, estimates based on reported last menstrual period (ideally recorded at the first antenatal visit) or fundal height estimations may be needed.…”

“…While communication and cooperation with hospital staff is critical, surveillance cannot depend on hospital staff or local resources; sufficient resources should be provided to the surveillance sites as part of the central surveillance network funding to ensure success. Gestational age determination poses the greatest challenge for standardization and should be determined by second trimester ultrasound whenever possible [20][21][22]. If not done, estimates based on reported last menstrual period (ideally recorded at the first antenatal visit) or fundal height estimations may be needed.…”