Reliability of Long Vein Grafts for Reconstruction of Massive Wounds

Abstract

When handling large wounds, zone of injury is a key concept in reconstructive microsurgery, as it pertains to the selection of recipient vessels. Historically, surgeons have avoided placing microvascular anastomosis within widely traumatized, inflamed, or radiated fields. The harvest of vein grafts facilitates reconstruction in complex cases by extending arterial and/or venous pedicle length. To illustrate the utility and fidelity of these techniques, this paper reviews the indications and outcomes for vein grafting in ten consecutive patients at a single tertiary referral center hospital. The case series presented is unique in three aspects. First, there are two cases of successful coaptation of the flap artery to the side of the arterial limb of an arteriovenous loop. Second, there is a large proportion of cases where vein grafts were used to elongate the venous pedicle. In these 10 cases, the mean vein graft length was 37 cm. We observed zero flap failures and zero amputations. Although limited in sample size, these case data support the efficacy and reliability of long segment vein grafting in complex cases in referral centers.

Staged treatment with arterial reconstruction and flap transplantation for ischemic mangled extremity: An observational study

“…If direct repair is not possible, an autologous vein graft is recommended because of long-term patency rate of autogenous vein graft. [ 4 – 6 ] If it is difficult to treat with direct sutures, the soft tissue should be reconstructed. [ 2 ] However, there is a disadvantage in that it is difficult to accurately predict the extent of further infection and necrosis of the contaminated tissue at an early stage.…”