“…By contrast, most recovery kinetic ( , MRT and HVT) variables showed fair to good absolute reliability yet good to almost perfect relative reliability with statistically significant differences in the responses of recovery kinetics after exercise between FLIA patients having predominantly subtle flow limitations and healthy subjects. Other studies showed that absolute values, amplitude and reoxygenation kinetics showed poor to near excellent relative reliability in varying populations and exercise types (Baláš et al, 2018 ; Buchheit et al, 2011 ; Cayot et al, 2021 ; Choo et al, 2016 ; Contreras‐Briceño et al, 2019 ; Crenshaw et al, 2012 ; Ihsan et al, 2013 ; Leclair et al, 2010 ; Lucero et al, 2018 ; McManus et al, 2018 ; Miranda‐Fuentes et al, 2020 ; Muthalib et al, 2010 ; Niemeijer et al, 2017 ; Pocivalnik et al, 2011 ; Thiel et al, 2011 ; Ubbink & Koopman, 2006 ). Given the combination of good to almost perfect relative reliability and significant differences in reoxygenation variables, results suggest that NIRS recovery kinetics (MRT and HVT) may be useful and may prove superior to ABI flexed when diagnosing sport‐related flow limitations in the iliac arteries.…”