2014
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000000014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Nasolabial Anthropometric Measures Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry in Infants with Unrepaired Unilateral Cleft Lip

Abstract: Diagnostic, II.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Anthropometric measurements were performed using 3dMD Vultus v.2.2.011 on threedimensional images that were captured at the immediate preoperative and postoperative clinic visits. The system of quantitative morphometry has been previously described 28 and is consistent with other reports. 29 We focused on measurements that have been found to be reliable on three-dimensional imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27 Anthropometric measurements were performed using 3dMD Vultus v.2.2.011 on threedimensional images that were captured at the immediate preoperative and postoperative clinic visits. The system of quantitative morphometry has been previously described 28 and is consistent with other reports. 29 We focused on measurements that have been found to be reliable on three-dimensional imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…29 We focused on measurements that have been found to be reliable on three-dimensional imaging. 28 These included medial lip height (sn-chpi), lateral lip height (sa-chpi), lateral lip length (ch-cphi), columellar angle, and nostril width. The columellar angle is measured from the submental view and is defined as the angle made by the columella relative to the sagittal plane of the face.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an ecology and evolutionary biology standpoint, perfect bilateral symmetry is defined as the optimal outcome of the development of bilateral traits in the absence of perturbations [1]. For human facial anthropometrics, perfect bilateral symmetry almost never exists, because random variations in asymmetry, within limits, have been recognized as normal and are called facial fluctuating asymmetry [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. When facial asymmetry is clinically obvious (called facial asymmetric deformity, which is more commonly directional rather than fluctuating), surgical or nonsurgical treatment may be required [3,4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the indirect anthropometric measurements made on these images has been evaluated [3], however this analysis still relies heavily on manual input. An automated computer-based system for facial analysis would greatly facilitate medical researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%