2016
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of new three-dimensional ultrasound technique for pelvic hiatal area measurement

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Whereas other 3D ultrasound contrast enhancement techniques have been recently used for other aims under different commercial names according to the manufacturer [5,6], to date none have been used as far as we know for the evaluation of the SPA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Whereas other 3D ultrasound contrast enhancement techniques have been recently used for other aims under different commercial names according to the manufacturer [5,6], to date none have been used as far as we know for the evaluation of the SPA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other techniques used to evaluate PFM function include electromyography (EMG), ultrasound, and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Many of these techniques have limited clinical utility as the result of poor validation or reliability, limited accessibility and high cost …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most patients this warping is rather minor and unlikely to introduce a clinically relevant error. The range of measurements suggests that the arbitrarily defined box depth of 1–2 cm described for the simplified method or VCI (thick slice) imaging of 1–2‐cm thickness will encompass the entire plane of minimal dimensions even in patients with the most marked degree of hiatal warping seen in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The original method for the assessment of hiatal dimensions relied on identifying a single axial plane of minimal hiatal dimensions, assuming that this plane is flat. Both measurement of hiatal dimensions and volume acquisition have been shown to be highly repeatable, by us and by other groups. However, it has since become apparent that the true plane of the levator hiatus is not flat or Euclidean, but is in fact warped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%