2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of non-destructive test techniques in the inspection of pipelines used in the oil industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the discussion of mechanized over manual NDT, mechanized is almost exclusively seen as the front-runner in achieving higher reliability. Other advantages include an increase in data consistency, inspection speed, and the probability of detection; the ability to store data and re-evaluate at a later point in time; the possibility of computerized or completely automated evaluation of data; the ability to augment scans from different directions; and so on [5]. Even though these arguments are not open to debate, the overwhelming focus on technology in this matter has led to neglecting some human performance issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the discussion of mechanized over manual NDT, mechanized is almost exclusively seen as the front-runner in achieving higher reliability. Other advantages include an increase in data consistency, inspection speed, and the probability of detection; the ability to store data and re-evaluate at a later point in time; the possibility of computerized or completely automated evaluation of data; the ability to augment scans from different directions; and so on [5]. Even though these arguments are not open to debate, the overwhelming focus on technology in this matter has led to neglecting some human performance issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the recent damage detection methods rely on visual inspection or on localized measurements such as acoustic or ultrasound methods, magnetic field methods, radiography, eddycurrent methods and thermal field method which requires that the vicinity of the damage area is known a priori and that the portion of the structure being inspected is readily accessible [1]. Those methods can detect damage on or near the surface of the structure [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CARVALHO et al [15] observaram que defeitos aflorando na superfície oposta, como a falta de penetração em um cordão de solda por exemplo, apresentam um erro no dimensionamento menor para técnicas ultra-sônicas automatizadas comparando com técnicas ultra-sônicas manuais, sendo que a probabilidade de detecção (POD) por TOFD é de 93,8%.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified