Reliability of rapid, semi‐automated assessment of plankton abundance, biomass, and growth rate estimates: Coulter Counter versus light microscope measurements

Abstract

Here we determined (1) how accurately the semi‐automated Coulter Counter (CC) measured the abundance, volume, and growth rates of mono‐specific plankton cultures compared to light microscopy and (2) whether CC‐derived particle size‐abundance spectra of whole water samples provided a near‐real time assessment of plankton community composition. A significant, positive relationship was found between CC particle and microscope cell abundance and volume estimates for 16 phylogenetically diverse plankton species. However, abundance estimates of the 2 methods differed significantly from a 1:1 relationship, with CC counts on average 15% greater than microscopy counts. Growth rate estimates showed excellent agreement for both methods for all species and were consistent over time. No significant differences in abundance, growth rate, or size estimates were observed due to light levels (Scrippsiella trochoidea) or strain variation (Heterosigma akashiwo). CC‐based, ship‐board characterization of whole plankton communities, from Georges Bank, captured changes in size‐abundance spectra and thus provided a coarse picture of in‐situ community composition. In the laboratory, the CC appears particularly well‐suited to measuring relative changes in cell abundance, such as for growth and grazing rate measurements of mono‐specific laboratory cultures, or when predator and prey species are well separated by size differences. Although microscopy remains essential for plankton analyses, these results suggest that the CC can increase sample size, improving accuracy, and precision of studies requiring frequent sampling or high degrees of replication. Deployment of these automated techniques in the field may aid in quantifying spatial and temporal variability in plankton community structure by forthcoming ocean‐observing systems.

Is chain length in phytoplankton regulated to evade predation?

“…Grazing by A.clausii on long and short chains was calculated from measured Skeletonema biovolume with a Beckman Coulter Multisizer III. Using biovolume we avoid a biased estimate due to different particle size in the cultures (Kim and Menden-Deuer, 2013). Clearance rate (F, ml ind -1 day -1 ) was calculated with a modified equation by Frost (Frost, 1972):…”

Many ways to stay in the game: individual variability maintains high biodiversity in planktonic microorganisms

“…including tolerance of environmental conditions [16], elemental composition [17] and growth rate [18]. A comprehensive study of intra-strain variability in one phytoplankton species showed distinguishing characteristics in cell size, maximum growth and photosynthesis rates, tolerance of low salinities, resource use and toxicity [10].…”

Trophic upgrading and mobilization of wax esters in microzooplankton

“…Grazer and phytoplankton prey abundance and cell size were monitored using a Multisizer TM 3 Coulter counter (version 3.53; Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The Coulter counter provided a more rapid and reliable sampling approach than microscopy and allowed convenient monitoring of the cultures over the course of the experiments (Kim & Menden-Deuer, 2013). Grazer and phytoplankton prey were easily distinguishable on the Coulter counter based on their respective size distributions.…”