2013
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the medial gastrocnemius muscle in poststroke patients

Abstract: In this study, the intra- and interexaminer reliability of the pennation angle and muscle thickness measurements of the medial gastrocnemius muscle was good to very good. Therefore, we suggest that the pennation angle and muscle thickness measurements of the medial gastrocnemius muscle obtained from rehabilitative ultrasound imaging would be useful for clinical assessment in poststroke patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reliability of ultrasonographic measurements of this muscle in post-stroke patients was shown in previous study [20]. In this study, intra-rater reliability of the examiner was also evaluated.…”
Section: Ultrasonographic Evaluation Of Muscle Architecturementioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reliability of ultrasonographic measurements of this muscle in post-stroke patients was shown in previous study [20]. In this study, intra-rater reliability of the examiner was also evaluated.…”
Section: Ultrasonographic Evaluation Of Muscle Architecturementioning
confidence: 68%
“…At each time, 3 images were taken from the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle of the affected side by the same examiner. The average value was considered for statistical analysis [20]. During these tests the leg position and the measurements were the same as the ultrasonographic measurements of the study which was described before.…”
Section: Intra-rater Reliability For the Ultrasonographic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Cho et al . demonstrated good intraobserver reliability for architectural measurements (thickness and PA) of GM at the ankle joint position at 90°, but with wide variation in the data (ICC = 0.69–0.99 [0.51–0.99]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, positioning for the examination differed. Measurements were made at 30% of the “tibial length,” defined as the distance from the popliteal crease to the midpoint of the lateral malleolus. The thickest part of the muscle was found “at the center of the muscle between its medial and posterior borders.” We believe that tracking a paretic and spastic GM muscle sometimes must take the disturbed organization of the muscle into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICCs of the type (3, 1) were used to assess the reliability of each parameter. ICC values were categorized as follows: poor, ≤0.20; fair, 0.21-0.40; moderate, 0.41-0.60; good, 0.61-0.80; and very good, ≥0.81 [14]. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the measurement, the standard error of the measurement (SEM) was calculated as the standard deviation×√ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%